top of page
Writer's pictureMichael Streilein

Cremation for Pets: A Detailed Comparison Between Traditional and Water-based Methods


A beloved pets ashes in a keepsake urn
A beloved pets ashes in a keepsake urn

Introduction to Pet Cremation


As pet owners, we share a profound bond with our furry companions. When they pass on, we strive to provide them with a dignified farewell, and pet cremation has increasingly become a popular choice. The two main types of pet cremation methods are traditional flame-based cremation and a newer, gentler method known as Aquamation.


Delving into Traditional Flame-based Cremation


Traditional flame-based cremation involves placing the pet's body in a cremation chamber, where the temperature rises to between 1400 and 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. This high heat and evaporation process typically lasts between 1-2 hours, reducing the body to bone fragments. These fragments are then ground into a fine ash.


The advantages of this method include its wide availability and relatively quick process. However, it comes with certain disadvantages such as high energy consumption due to the heat levels required and potential emotional discomfort for pet owners due to the intense heat involved.


Moreover, flame-based cremation has a considerable environmental impact. The process consumes large amounts of natural gas, contributes to air pollution, and releases around 573 pounds of carbon dioxide per body cremated.


Unpacking Aquamation or Water Cremation


Aquamation, also known as water cremation or alkaline hydrolysis, is an eco-friendly alternative. This method involves placing the pet's body in a clean stainless-steel vessel, where a water-based solution heated to approximately 200 degrees Fahrenheit gently breaks down the body over 10-12 hours, leaving only the bone fragments behind. These are then rinsed, dried, and returned as ashes to the pet owners.

The benefits of Aquamation are numerous:

  • It's gentle and natural, mimicking the same process that occurs in nature when a body decomposes in the soil.

  • It uses 90% less energy than traditional cremation, significantly reducing its environmental footprint.

  • The process doesn't release harmful emissions, making it a more sustainable choice.

  • The resulting ashes are sterile and safe to handle, containing more mineral content than flame-based cremation ashes.

In terms of environmental impact, Aquamation is far superior to flame-based cremation. It releases no harmful emissions and conserves energy, offering a more sustainable option for environmentally conscious pet owners.


Drawing Comparisons Between Flame-based Cremation and Aquamation


Both flame-based cremation and Aquamation provide a way to return a beloved pet's remains to their owners. However, the processes, environmental impacts, and emotional considerations differ significantly.


Aquamation uses water instead of fire, which is gentler and more natural. It reduces the carbon footprint significantly compared to flame-based cremation, making it the greener choice.


Emotionally, many pet owners report finding comfort in the gentle nature of Aquamation. Companies like Pet to Nature in Calgary strive to offer this compassionate service, emphasizing its eco-friendly and respectful approach.


Wrapping Up: A Closer Look at Flame and Water Cremation


In comparing traditional flame-based cremation and Aquamation, we see key differences in process, environmental impact, and emotional considerations. Aquamation stands out as a more environmentally friendly and gentle method.


For pet owners considering cremation, it's important to be aware of these options and choose the one that best aligns with your values and emotional needs.


Aquamation's increasing popularity is a testament to its numerous benefits, particularly its eco-friendly aspect. As awareness grows, it's likely to become a preferred choice for many pet owners wishing to give their beloved pets a dignified farewell. Sources https://www.betterplaceforests.com/blog/cremation/everything-you-need-to-know-about-animal-cremation-services/ Wikipedia

48 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page